Someone sent me an inspirational song today and I ended up wandering the labyrinth of YouTube. I used to do this before I was locked up and often my kids would be sitting beside me egging me on. It was really so much better than television. I wonder if you do this too.
The person who sent the video wasn’t responsible for my travels in the maze of twisty passages, but I couldn’t help but look to my right and see the related videos just waiting to be clicked. Google knows I’m a sucker for the talent competitions, so many of the videos were of various Simon Cowell productions, America’s Got Talent, Britain’s got Talent or The X-Factor.
The Ten Best Auditions! Says one title that I couldn’t help but click. It was a compilation and the first to audition is a deaf girl who’s come to sing a song of her own composition called “Try.” I must admit that the young lady’s story and her honest song made me cry. (Try made me cry.) As in, tears were streaming down my cheeks. Then the next audition on the same video was of a young girl with anxiety disorder who was accomplishing something by merely being in front of the audience. Howie Mandel revealed that he also suffers from an anxiety issue – O.C.D. – in order to soften up the audience. He wanted the audience to relate to her pain and to understand how hard it was for her to even be present. He appealed to their emotions.
And isn’t it strange how when we want to get our way we often appeal to, some might say manipulate, the pain or joy of others? Or is it strange? Is it just what works? Its easy to stand back and judge people for using appeals to emotion to sell stuff and ideas. We’d all like knowledge to be king when it comes to politics, for instance, but we find that the thing that works is often an appeal to emotions.
In prison, it is rare to see pure joyful abandon. I’ve noticed how much I missed that kind of joy now that I am out. Music for instance, which is one of my passions, is not something that one can participate in Texas prisons unless you play in the church band or sing along with your twenty dollar radio. They don’t allow musical instruments outside special sanctioned events and locations. And inmates don’t get YouTube so they never get to see the sort of joyful revelry which could be witnessed watching Jeff Beck’s band (I dare you to suggest Tal Wilkenson, Beck’s bassist is not playing with pure joy) or the other videos I watched today including Mandy Harvey who said at her audition, “After I lost my hearing I just gave up. But I want to do more with my life than just give up.”
The lack of joyful expression in prison goes along with the lack of pain expression. This isn’t to say that they don’t exist in prison. Pain is everywhere. Joy is occasionally found but it seems so out of place that those who are discovered being joyful are often reprimanded by guards or other inmates. It just isn’t right to be joyful in a place like prison. Coincidentally, the majority opinion in Big Justice right now is that when people are sent to prison, they should just give up even if they want to do more with their life. They have been adjudicated failures. The script now must be adhered to by all the bit players. Everybody needs to play their part and anyone who goes outside the script is a danger. Even you non-felons have a part to play according to the script writers. If you’re reading this you may already be going off-script. Congratulations.
Prisoners are unwitting accomplices to the systematic suppression of their emotions. Take pain for instance. Genuine pain is dangerous to share. Showing pain makes one vulnerable. And vulnerable people are preyed upon. You can be extorted, raped or killed if you show vulnerability in prison. Not just by the inmates. In fact, it is in prison where the notion of vulnerability as a super power has to have originated. If you can be vulnerable in prison, Clark Kent ought to tremble at your feet. (If he was a real person that is). There really are men in prison who do not react to vulnerability with violence but it isn’t the norm and it is rarely anyone who works for the prison.
I have always had a hard time with pain. Not only sharing it but standing in place for somebody in pain. I had a a celly once on the Dalhart unit who I really liked. We were housed in the faith based dorm and one day he got called out to the Major’s office around Christmas. I wasn’t aware of this but I did notice he had been gone a while which wasn’t typical. He was what some call a “house mouse.” He didn’t like to spend a lot of time in the day room and stayed in reading or filling out workbook assignments required as part of the dorm’s educational activities. He came back late that afternoon with his head low, refusing to make eye contact. He sat on his bunk in silence.
I could feel tension like a thick blanket, a common occurrence in prison. Unable to withstand, I asked him finally what was wrong. He choked back a sob and tried to talk. “My mother and my brother-in-law both died last week,” he coughed. He had talked about both often. They were his sole means of support besides his sister, who was only marginally involved in his life. And now they were both gone. Within days of one another they had passed and letters of the news had been intercepted by the mail room and forwarded to the chaplain who was not available. The duty of informing the inmate had passed to rank.
I felt awkward and uncomfortable because I wanted to lose it myself. What a tragedy. The only thing to do was to sit there, offer a hug and listen. Yeah. A Hug. In prison. Not a fist bump or a pat on the back but a real live hug. I remember thinking how rare this was on several levels. I had heard of similar catastrophes happening but always to people far removed.
Yet, outside of our cell, my celly, I’ll call him Jose, remained guarded. He wasn’t eager to be vulnerable to the whole pod even if many of our neighbors were committed to the kinds of behavior that faith promotes: mercy, forgiveness and compassion. I wanted to help Jose overcome his fear of trusting others. But I also thought that I might not be doing him any favors by encouraging him to step out and share his grief. I didn’t think there was a lot of danger but I also didn’t know if I would have done the same were I in his shoes.
Prison is not designed for humans. It is ironic that our society wants to punish people for stepping outside what is deemed acceptable societal norms but it does not seek to improve or educate the punished person in what that would look like. (Figure it out, loser!) Instead, people are sent to warehouses to endure their sentences and cope with their feelings using the strategies they learned before being locked up. And they’re locked up with overseers who have been conditioned to believe that they are an integral part of the punishment regimen, rather than being there to ensure the safety of their charges.
I didn’t begin to write a screed decrying the faults of our prison system but to point out that our attitude about prison is due to emotional manipulation. Some of this is the pure emotion of having been victimized by crime. Not a fun feeling. Yet this pain is used as a weapon and a tool for demagogues. “Lock them up and throw away the key,” they say. “Prison isn’t supposed to be pleasant. ” If they wanted to go to a country club they should have victimized society the old fashioned way, by going to law school or running for office. Apologies to Bryan Stevenson and Barry Scheck who break the mold.
Now there are people who think that the incarcerated are human and that by improving the condition of the incarcerated it can only improve society once a rehabilitated prisoner is released. And one of the ways that many advocates are trying to change the system is to promote programs that reduce recidivism. They’re appealing to the facts and data because that’s what legislators and prison administrators claim to care about. But there is a problem with this approach because a good idea which improves opportunities for prisoners might not result in declines in recidivism rates. But what if it reduces the rates of rape and extortion? What if a program helps people in prison communicate their feelings and improves their mental health but doesn’t necessarily knock down the rates of re-offense? Does that make it a bad program? Is that program now worthless because we can’t measure it against recidivism rates and see a benefit?
What sort of system spends its energy re-enforcing the very errors in thinking which contributed to a person’s mistakes in action? The kind of system that is fueled by the emotions of those who assume that the outcome they’ve been promised is reality.
Yet, at some level a person has to realize that when you transform a victim into an avenger, you have not achieved anything other than to bring the victim down to the level of the criminal. It’s a base, selfish reaction to crime to want personal satisfaction over societal security. Merely locking people away may make society temporarily safer while the criminal is locked up. But without any accompanying education, you only result in releasing embittered societal rejects. So, to prevent more retaliation from these embittered rejects, we simply lock them up so long that by the time they do leave prison they require hospice.
It’s the same mentality which says we ought to just keep the innocent men locked up in Guantanamo forever because if they weren’t terrorists before we locked them up, they will be after we let them go. While fear is a terrible way to govern, it is an awfully effective tool for manipulation.
When do we stop listening to fear and pain, and listen to joy? Joy? You ask. Yeah. Joy. How radical is it to imagine it being OK for an incarcerated person to feel and express joy?
It only seems radical. Prisoners have families. They have adopters. They have triumphs. How likely is it for a person who is encouraged and allowed to experience joy to desire pain for others? Not very likely. So when do we stop allowing our emotions to be manipulated by people who have no joy in their own lives? Sometime around the moment when we encourage people to find joy even if they are in prison.
A.T.